The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq
What if the government decided to invent a great lie to sell a disastrous war and a questionable anti-terrorism policy? What would happen to the Assets who know the truth?
In the new second edition, former CIA Asset, Susan Lindauer, provides an extraordinary first-hand account from behind the intelligence curtain that shatters the government’s lies about 9/11 and Iraq, and casts a harsh spotlight on the workings of the Patriot Act as the ideal weapon to bludgeon whistle blowers and dissidents. A terrifying true story of “black budget” betrayals and the Patriot Act, with its arsenal of secret evidence, indefinite detention and threats of forcible drugging, EXTREME PREJUDICE reveals one Asset’s desperate struggle to survive the brutal cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq.
EXTREME PREJUDICE delivers a high tension expose of the real facts surrounding the CIA’s advance warnings of 9/11 and Iraq’s contributions to the 9/11 investigation. For the first time, it reveals the existence of a comprehensive peace framework, which would have accomplished all major U.S. objectives in Baghdad without a single casualty. A true life spy thriller that goes inside the Iraqi Embassy and prison on a Texas military base, EXTREME PREJUDICE reveals the depths of deception by leaders in Washington and London to promote a questionable image of their successful anti-terrorism policy, and the shocking brutality used to suppress the truth of their failures from the American people and the world community.
Above all, EXTREME PREJUDICE offers a critical examination of the Patriot Act’s assault on defendant rights in the Courts, when liberty and freedom to dissent from government policy are the highest stakes. EXTREME PREJUDICE is a personal narrative accessible to all audiences, not an academic book.
“Susan Lindauer deserves unreserved admiration for this brave and moving account of her steadfast refusal to crumble under the shameful abuses to which she was subjected. She has provided us with an overdue exposure of the depths to which governments are all too prepared to descend to prevent disclosure of their dishonesty and malfeasance, her knowledge having been gained through bitter personal experience.” –Robert Black, Q.C., Scottish architect of the Lockerbie Trial at CampZeist
“Unfolds like a suspense thriller from deep within the struggle for global sanity, at the hands of those perpetrating dark secrecy. Lindauer reveals faces of our national truth few Americans imagine. Chilling, heartbreaking, horrifying and hopeful, EXTREME PREJUDICE offers a depth of historical insight critical to transforming our future. Pay attention.” –Janice Matthews, Director, 911Truth.org
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860)
In the last week we have been following British and French’s desperate attempts to push for a military intervention in Syria. It is far from being a secret that both British and French government are dominated by the Jewish Lobby. In Britain it is the ultra Zionist CFI (Conservative Friends of Israel) – apparently 80% of Britain’s conservative MPs are members of the pro Israeli Lobby. In France the situation is even more devastating, the entire political system is hijacked by the forceful CRIF.
But in case anyone fails to grasp why the Jewish Lobby is pushing for an immediate intervention, Debka, an Israeli news outlet provides the answer. Seemingly, the Syrian army is winning on all fronts. Israel’s military and geo-political calculations are proved to be wrong.
According to Debka, “the battle for Damascus is over”. The Syrian army had virtually “regained control of the city in an epic victory”. The rebels, largely mercenaries, have lost the battle they “can’t do much more than fire sporadically. They can no longer launch raids, or pose threats to the city centre, the airport or the big Syrian air base nearby. The Russian and Iranian transports constantly bringing replenishments for keeping the Syrian army fighting can again land at Damascus airport after months of rebel siege.”
But it isn’t just the capital. Debka reports that “Hezbollah and Syrian units have tightened their siege on the rebels holding out in the northern sector of al Qusayr; other (Syrian army) units have completed their takeover of the countryside around the town of Hama; and a third combined Syrian-Hizballah force has taken up positions around Aleppo.”
Debka maintains that senior IDF officers criticized the Israeli defense minister (MosheYa’alon) who “mislead” the Knesset a few days ago estimating that “Bashar Assad controlled only 40% of Syrian territory.” Debka suggests that Israeli defense Minister drawn on a “flawed intelligence assessment and were concerned that the armed forces were acting on the basis of inaccurate intelligence.” Debka stresses, “erroneous assessments… must lead to faulty decision-making.”
Debka is clearly brave enough to admit that Israeli military miscalculations may have lead to disastrous consequences. It reports, “the massive Israeli bombardment of Iranian weapons stored near Damascus for Hezbollah, turned out a month later to have done more harm than good. It gave Bashar Assad a boost instead of weakening his resolve.”
Debka is obviously correct. It doesn’t take a genius to predict that an Israeli attack on an Arab land cannot be accepted by the Arab masses, not even by Assad’s bitterest Arab opponents.
Debka maintains that the “intelligence focus on military movements in Syria especially around Damascus to ascertain that advanced missiles and chemical weapons don’t reach Hezbollah laid to a failure of in detecting major movement by Hezbollah militia units towards the Syrian-Israeli border.”
Israel is now facing a new reality. It is facing Hezbollah reinforcements streaming in from Lebanon towards the Golan heights and its border with Syria.
Israel, Debka concludes, will soon find itself “face to face for the first time with Hezbollah units equipped with heavy arms and missiles on the move along the Syrian-Israeli border and manning positions opposite Israel’s Golan outposts and villages.”
Debka is correct to suggest that instead of “growing weaker, Iran’s Lebanese proxy is poised to open another warfront and force the IDF to adapt to a new military challenge from the Syrian Golan.”
Rather than The Guardian or the Le Monde, it is actually the Israeli Debka that helps us to grasp why Britain and France are so desperate to intervene. Once again, it is a Zionist war which they are so eager to fight.
Sadly enough, it isn’t The Guardian or The New York Times that is there to reveal the latest development in Syria and expose Israeli lethal miscalculations. It is actually a ‘Zionist’ Israeli patriotic outlet that is providing the good. I actually believe that this form of harsh self-criticism that is embedded in Israeli culture, is the means that sustains Israeli regional hegemony, at least monetarily. This ability to critically examine and disapprove your own leadership is something I fail to encounter in Western media. Seemingly, the media in Israel is far more tolerant toward criticism than the Zionist dominated Media in the West.
USA: Where there is No Democracy that Holds Government Accountable; Only a Brainwashed People who are Chaff in the Wind
It has been public information for a decade that the US government secretly, illegally, and unconstitutionally spies on its citizens. Congress and the federal courts have done nothing about this extreme violation of the US Constitution and statutory law, and the insouciant US public seems unperturbed.
In 2004 a whistleblower informed the New York Times that the National Security Agency (NSA) was violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by ignoring the FISA court and spying on Americans without obtaining the necessary warrants. The corrupt New York Times put the interests of the US government ahead of those of the American public and sat on the story for one year until George W. Bush was safely reelected.
By the time the New York Times published the story of the illegal spying one year later, the law-breaking government had had time to mitigate the offense with ex post facto law or executive orders and explain away its law-breaking as being in the country’s interest.
Last year William Binney, who was in charge of NSA’s global digital data gathering program revealed that NSA had everyone in the US under total surveillance. Every email, Internet site visited and phone call is captured and stored. In 2012 Binney received the Callaway Award for Civic Courage, an annual award given to those who champion constitutional rights at risk to their professional and personal lives.
There have been a number of whistleblowers. For example, in 2006 Mark Klein revealed that AT&T had a secret room in its San Francisco office that NSA used to collect Internet and phone-call data from US citizens who were under no suspicion.
The presstitute media handled these stories in ways that protected the government’s lawlessness from scrutiny and public outrage. The usual spin was that the public needs to be safe from terrorists, and safety is what the government is providing.
The latest whistle blower, Edward Snowden, has sought refuge in Hong Kong, which has a better record of protecting free speech than the US government. Snowden did not trust any US news source and took the story to the British newspaper, the Guardian.
There is no longer any doubt whatsoever that the US government is lawless, that it regards the US Constitution as a scrap of paper, that it does not believe Americans have any rights other than those that the government tolerates at any point in time, and that the government has no fear of being held accountable by the weak and castrated US Congress, the sycophantic federal courts, a controlled media, and an insouciant public.
Binney and Snowden have described in precisely accurate detail the extreme danger from the government’s surveillance of the population. No one is exempt, not the Director of the CIA, US Army Generals, Senators and Representatives, not even the president himself.
Anyone with access to a computer and the Internet can find interviews with Binney and Snowden and become acquainted with why you do have very much indeed to fear whether or not you are doing anything wrong.
James Clapper, the lying Director of National Intelligence, who would have been perfectly at home in the Hitler or Stalin regimes, condemned Snowden as “reprehensible” for insisting that in a democracy the public should know what the government is doing. Clapper insisted that secretly spying on every ordinary American was essential in order to “protect our nation.”
Clapper is “offended” that Americans now know that the NSA is spying on the ordinary life of every American. Clapper wants Snowden to be severely punished for his “reckless disclosure” that the US government is totally violating the privacy that the US Constitution guarantees to every US citizen.
President Obama allegedly educated in constitutional law, justified Clapper’s program of spying on every communication of every American citizen as a necessary violation of Americans’ civil liberties that “protects your civil liberties.” Contrast the lack of veracity of the President of the United States with the truthfulness of Snowden, who correctly stated that the NSA spying is an “existential threat to democracy.”
The presstitutes are busy at work defending Clapper and Obama. On June 9, CNN rolled out former CIA case officer Bob Baer to implant into the public’s mind that Snowden, far from trying to preserve US civil liberties, might be a Chinese spy and that Snowden’s revelations might be indicative of a Chinese espionage case.
Demonization is the US government’s technique for discrediting Bradley Manning for complying with the US Military Code and reporting war crimes and for persecuting Julian Assange of Wikileaks for reporting leaked information about the US government’s crimes. Demonization and false charges will be the government’s weapon against Snowden. Read the rest of this entry »
Turkey Defies The AKP – Muslim Brotherhood Coup D´Etat and the Rewriting of Turkey´s History.
Christof Lehmann (nsnbc),- Mass protests in Turkey as well as violent police crack downs in 48 cities have resulted in approximately 1000 injured and several dead. After the AKP government of R. Tayyip Erdogan took on itself the responsibility for the most violent police crack-down the Turkish population has witnessed for decades, the protests increasingly begin to reflect the increasing popular discontent and frustrations which have been building since the AKP government came to power in Turkey. After the Erdogan government, with the words of protesters “has gotten blood on its hands”, protesters throughout Turkey rally around a simple and unequivocal demand. The Erdogan Government has to step down. The mass protests are an artifact of a Turkish population that defies the AKP – Muslim Brotherhood Coup D´Etat.
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
The protests began with a peaceful occupation of Gezi Park near Taksim Square in central Istanbul. Besides being a breathing hole and oasis in the city, Gezi Park and Taksim Square are important symbols for progressive, secular, nationalist and Kemalist Turks. The park and square have been used as traditional rally points since the liberation of Turkey and the victory of the Turkish Revolution on 29 October 1929.
The main reason for, why the police crack-down on the park protesters on Friday morning could ignite mass protests with more than 200.000 protesters in more than 30 cities throughout Turkey on Friday evening is, that the crack-down on the people who protested for the preservation of the tradition-laden park equaled a police crack-down on the founding principles of the Turkish nation-state, the republic, as a democratic and secular state that does not interfere in the internal affairs of its Arab neighbors. The plan to build not only a shopping mall, but to re-erect military barracks from the Ottoman period in the square is by the vast majority of Turks perceived as a direct provocation and slap into the face of the Turkish Republic which is based on Kemalist principles.
On Friday, after crack-down on the protesters in Gezi Park, and after the mass protests began throughout Turkey, R. Tayyip Erdogan remained defiant and announced that he was determined to go ahead with carrying out the construction plans in Taksim Square.
Photo from twitter.com user @SelenCanB
Photo from twitter.com user @SelenCanB
“Police will be on duty today and also tomorrow because Taksim Square cannot be an area where extremists are running wild” Erdogan stated to the press and continued, blaming the protesters for the violence and for having escalated their opposition to the governments policies over the past months. “We will rebuild the military barracks according to the project and it is unclear if the site would include a mall,” said Erdogan, while calling for an immediate end of the protests.
The rebuilding of the military barracks from the Ottoman period are by many Turks perceived as one more attempt by the Muslim Brotherhood associated AKP government to re-write the history of Turkey and to reverse the victory of the Turkish revolution in 1929.
Traditionally, on 29 October, Turks are taking to the streets in the tens or hundred of thousands to celebrate ” Republic Day” which most Turks consider as one of the most important, if not as “the” most important public holiday in Turkey. On Republic day, Turks are celebrating the victory of the Turkish revolution on 29 October 1923 under the leadership of Kamal Attaturk over imperialism and its proxies.
In 2012 the AKP government of Prime Minister R. Tayyip Erdogan officially banned any public marches and celebrations on 29 October. Most opposition parties described the ban as an attempt by the AKP and the Muslim brotherhood to re-write history. More than 200.000 Turks went into the streets on Republic Day 2012, defied the governments ban and marched toward police barricades which had been erected in Istanbul. The number of protesters was so overwhelming for the police forces, that they voluntarily removed the barricades – and themselves – before being removed.
The Erdogan administrations plan to re-build the Ottoman period military barracks and eventually the mall is perceived as a direct slap into the face of Turkish nationalism, of Turkish independence from imperialism and the foundation of Turkey as a secular state.
Over the last years, the Erdogan administration has increasingly come under fire for despotism and for attempts to “Islamize” Turkish society. Although the vast majority of Turks are Muslims, the vast majority of Turks is also highly suspicious against any attempts to change Turkey´s status as a nation state with a secular constitution.
Among the events that have provoked wide spread discontent are numerous cases in which the police has been turning a blind eye to women being harassed and threatened for not veiling their face in public.
Another source of wide spread discontent and frustrations with the Erdogan administration is the Ergenkonen Case, which leading members of the opposition, high-ranking military officers and large segments of the Turkish population perceive as a de facto coup d´etat by the Muslim Brotherhood, the AKP and the Erdogan administration. In the Ergenkonen case some 300 military officers have been arrested and charged with espionage. Some 300 more military officers as well as dozens of civilians have been arrested and charged on a milder espionage paragraph for “passing on secret information”.
Both leading members of the Turkish opposition and analysts, including the author of this article, have repeatedly stated that the arrests and imprisonment of 600 key military officers and dozens of leading members of the opposition constitute a de facto coup d´etat by the AKP government of R. Tayyip Erdogan.
The Ergenkonen case and the arrests on manufactured and trumped-up charges was not only a coup d´etat, but most likely also one of the primary steps taken by the AKP government of Erdogan, to prepare the ranks of the Turkish military for a military aggression against Syria.
It must be remembered, within this context, that the initial main fighting force of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” consisted of Muslim Brotherhood dominated corps which were heavily supported with mercenaries or volunteers from within the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood, and who from day one of the uprising in Syria were supported with weapons, logistics, as well as with special forces. This initial fighting force was heavily reinforced by Libyan fighters. Only after the decisive defeat of the Free Syrian Army after two failed campaigns to secure the city of Aleppo as seat for a transitional government, the massive influx of Wahhabi and Salafist mercenaries, organized primarily via al-Qaeda´s Turkey – Syria franchise Jabhat al-Nusrah began.
The mass protests in Turkey, with hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets of Istanbul, Ankara and more than 40 other cities have little to do with 600 trees.
erdogan – a fair fighterThe protests in Turkey are a manifestation of a Turkish population that is waking up to the fact that they have to take their country back from the grip of the Muslim Brotherhood and from the grip of an AKP government which has aligned itself with imperialism, against its neighbor Syria, and which ultimately facilitates long-term US-strategies to “balkanize” Turkey.
While this article is being written, police forces in Istanbul are firing tear gas into the masses in yet one more attempt to disperse the protesters. Given the years of frustration and built-up anger with the Muslim Brotherhood and the arrogance of the AKP government of R. Tayyip Erdogan in the face of masses who demand that the government, which came to and held on to power by a coup d´etat,; which has led the nation into a war on its neighbor by sponsoring al-Qaeda mercenaries and terrorists; which has arrested hundreds of military officers and opposition leaders on false and trumped-up charges; the situation has a propensity toward developing into a protracted and violent stand off. The question is, how many rounds will the AKP – Muslim Brotherhood alliance or the opposition stand, and does Erdogan fight like Mike Tyson ? (In that case, opposition, take care of your ears.)
Violent clashes erupted on the streets of Istanbul, as Turkish people battled President Erdogan’s soldiers in scenes reminiscent of Tahrir Square. It does appear the Arab Spring has moved into Turkey.
Who (really) killed Gadhaffi? All of the Libyan rebels credited with Gadhaffi’s murder died themselves within a year. Ambassador Stevens was also killed, and the Embassy archives vanished.
IN FIRST BROADCAST INTERVIEW
FORMER DRONE OPERATOR BRANDON BRYANT DISCUSSES
PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MISSIONS
ON NPR’S ‘ALL THINGS CONSIDERED’ SUNDAY, MAY 5
HOMELESS AND SUFFERING FROM PTSD, BRYANT SAYS
“ONE OF THE WEIRD THINGS ABOUT THE WHOLE DRONE COMMUNITY IS YOU DON’T TALK ABOUT ANYTHING THAT YOU’VE DONE.”
In his first broadcast interview after serving as a drone operator for the U.S. Air Force, Brandon Bryant speaks with NPR’s weekends on All Things Considered guest host, Kelly McEvers, about the psychological effects of firing missiles into Afghanistan from a Las Vegas control room. Now, homeless and suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder at just 27 years old, Bryant delves into the far-reaching effects of executing people with the push of a button.
The conversation airs in full this Sunday on All Things Considered (find local stations and broadcast times at npr.org/stations); audio will be available on Sunday at approximately 7:00PM (ET) at NPR.org. Several excerpts follow:
On killing what he considered a non-hostile target that may have been a child, Bryant says: “I felt really numb. I didn’t feel distraught like I felt my first [drone] shot. I felt numb because this was the reality of war. Three instances in three months showed pretty much every aspect there is. That good guys can die, bad guys can die, and innocents can die as well.”
On his reasons for leaving the Air Force, Bryant says: “I tried to talk to a couple people about it and one of the weird things about the whole drone community is you don’t talk about anything that you’ve done. You just don’t.”
He continues: “And no one wanted to talk about it so I just shut up and didn’t talk to anyone about how I was feeling or how I was doing.”
All Things Considered, NPR’s signature afternoon newsmagazine, is hosted by Melissa Block, Audie Cornish and Robert Siegel and reaches more than 12 million listeners weekly. To find local stations and broadcast times for the program, visit http://www.npr.org/stations
Underlining once again how the White House is openly seeking to arm terrorists in Syria, video has emerged of one of the FSA rebel groups referring to their unit as the “Osama Bin Laden” brigade.
The clip shows one of the militants proclaim how he is part of “The Osama bin Laden brigade of the Souqour Dimashq (Hawks of Damascus) Battalion…..Allahu Akbar!” as the insurgents prepare to attack a Syrian Army checkpoint.
“Western countries have been claiming that the FSA is comprised of somewhat “secular” people and that jihadists have only joined the fight but they are not part of the FSA. Well, you cannot get more al-Qaeda’ish than calling a brigade “Osama bin Laden,” states the description accompanying the video.
Indeed, while the media narrative has attempted to frame the presence of Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria under the banner of Jabhat Al-Nusra as a separate entity to FSA fighters, whom the White House is now preparing to arm with heavy weaponry, 29 FSA groups pledged allegiance to Al-Nusra, which was responsible for killing U.S. troops in Iraq, immediately after the group was declared a terrorist organization by the State Department back in December.
A May 8 London Guardian report noted how Jabhat al-Nusra is “emerging as the best-equipped, financed and motivated force fighting Bashar al-Assad’s regime,” and how droves of FSA fighters are now joining its ranks.
This is by no means the first time western-backed FSA rebels have proudly proclaimed their affinity with Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.
As we reported earlier this year, video footage emerged showing Syrian rebels singing songs in praise of Osama Bin Laden while celebrating the “sweet memory” of the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.
“They (Twin Towers) have gone with the blink of an eye, oh how sweet is the memory,” the crowd sings in Arabic. “Our leader Osama Bin Laden, America’s worst nightmare,” the song continues as the crowd cheers, “If they call me a terrorist I will consider it an honor, our terror is blessed, a divine call, Allah is our goal we strive to reach him.”
FSA fighters have also displayed the black Al-Qaeda flag on innumerable occasions, including recently during a series of grisly public executions.
A Syrian rebel quoted by McClatchy Newspapers last year was overheard to remark, “When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!” Other militants have appeared in You Tube videos speaking of their desire to see the Al-Qaeda flag fly over the White House and impose Sharia law once the rebels are victorious across the region.
Rebels have also been caught on camera burning U.S. flags and chanting anti-American slogans.
The fact that Syrian opposition fighters are increasingly being exposed as sectarian jihadists loyal to Al-Qaeda, in addition to their innumerable atrocities, has derailed the now flimsy narrative that the FSA is comprised of freedom fighters who merely want to topple the dictatorship of Bashar Al-Assad to restore liberty in Syria.
With the Syrian Army winning major battles and reclaiming key areas of the country, the White House and other NATO powers are rapidly running out of time in their bid to oversee a repeat of what happened in Libya, where Al-Qaeda insurgents were also armed as part of the effort to depose Colonel Gaddafi, a process that led to the country being overtaken by brutal warlords and terrorist gangs who later took part in the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi last September.
Despite the fact that FSA rebels are being led and taught how to build bombs by Al-Qaeda militants, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs panel Rep. Eliot Engel has introduced legislation urging the Obama administration to send $150 million in “lethal and non-lethal security assistance” to the insurgents. Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said that the Obama administration was “rethinking” its opposition to arming the rebels.
However, as the New York Times reported, the CIA has already been involved in “a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad” since early 2012.
Watch a video clip of western-backed rebels singing the praises of Osama bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11 attacks below.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
Al Qaeda's plan for Libya Highlighted in Congressional Report
By THOMAS JOSCELYN
An unclassified report published in August highlights al Qaeda's strategy for building a fully operational network in Libya. The report ("Al Qaeda in Libya: A Profile") was prepared by the federal research division of the Library of Congress (LOC) under an agreement with the Defense Department's Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office.
An unclassified report published in August highlights al Qaeda’sstrategy for building a fully operational network in Libya. The report (“Al Qaeda in Libya: A Profile”) was prepared by the federal research division of the <a class="zem_slink" title="Library of Congress" href="http://maps.google.com/maps? Library of Congress (LOC) under an agreement with the Defense Department’s Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office.
Al Qaeda’s senior leadership (AQSL) in Pakistan has overseen the effort. AQSL “issued strategic guidance to followers in Libya and elsewhere to take advantage of the Libyan rebellion,” the report reads.
AQSL ordered its followers to “gather weapons,” “establish training camps,” “build a network in secret,” “establish an Islamic state,” and “institute sharia” law in Libya.
Each part of this strategy is being implemented, and al Qaeda’s plan has advanced to the final stages. The three conceptual phases of an al Qaeda affiliate’s development are outlined in a chart prepared by the US military and shown here.The chart shows that, according to the US military, Al Qaeda’s operatives in Libya have already completed many of the tasks set forth by AQSL.
Pakistan dispatched trusted senior operatives as emissaries and leaders who could supervise building a network,” the report notes. They have been successful in establishing “a core network in Libya,” but they still act clandestinely and refrain from using the al Qaeda name.
The report finds that al Qaeda “will likely continue to mask its presence under the umbrella of the Libyan "Salafi" and Salafist movement,with which it shares a radical ideology and a general intent to implement sharia in Libya and elsewhere.”
Recent reports from the ground suggest that America and its allies are losing their covert war in support of the Al Nusra front. In recent weeks, the US sponsored Al Qaeda affiliated rebels have been decimated by the Syrian Armed Forces.
A nationwide offensive has been launched with the support of Russia and Iran. The weapons supply routes of the rebels have been disrupted:
“the [Syrian] army has concentrated on starving, and cutting off “rebel” supply routes and arms corridors, which predominantly run through Northern Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan” (See Buying Time in Syria by Phil Greaves, Global Research, May 11, 2013)
Al Nusra is largely made up of mercenaries recruited in Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Covert (Western) special forces and military advisers have also integrated their ranks.
The Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists directly funded by Washington constitute the foot-soldiers of the Western military alliance.
Confirmed by CNN, the Al Nusra terrorists have also been trained in the use of chemical weapons by special forces on contract to the Pentagon:
The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources. Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials.
The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American. (CNN, December 09, 2012, emphasis added
And once these Al Qaeda rebels had been supplied and trained in the use of WMDs by military contractors hired by the Pentagon, the Syrian government would then be held responsible for using the WMD against the Syrian people.
