Syria Chemical Weapons: Finger points to Jihadists

Posted: March 24, 2013 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , ,
The Telegraph–London
6:18PM GMT 23 Mar 2013

A Syrian Army source gives the first account of what is believed to have been a chemical attack – and it could mean that one of the West’s biggest fears is about to come true. Channel 4’s Alex Thomson reports.

Whatever happened last week in the town of Khan al-Assal, west of Aleppo, it achieved something extraordinary in the Syrian civil war: unity among Washington, Moscow and Damascus

Black smoke rise from buildings due to government forces shelling, in Aleppo Photo: AP/AMC

By Alex Thomson, Chief Correspondent, Channel 4 News

6:18PM GMT 23 Mar 2013

Whatever happened last week in the town of Khan al-Assal, west of Aleppo, it achieved something extraordinary in the Syrian civil war: unity among Washington, Moscow and Damascus.

All welcomed the rapid decision by Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary-general, to investigate an alleged chemical attack that reportedly killed 26, including Syrian soldiers.

Unusually, the request for that investigation came from the Syrian regime, which claimed that Islamic jihadist rebels launched a chemical weapons attack. Since then, precious little evidence in any way has come from the area despite an awful lot of diplomatic noise around the world.

However a senior source close to the Syrian Army has given Channel 4 News the first clear account of what he claims is believed to have occurred on Tuesday. He is a trusted and hitherto reliable source who does not wish to be identified.

The Syrian military is said to believe that a home-made locally-manufactured rocket was fired, containing a form of chlorine known as CL17, easily available as a swimming pool cleaner. They claim that the warhead contained a quantity of the gas, dissolved in saline solution.

The source said that the town of Khan al-Assal has been in government control since March 13 but – like so much of the area – has been much fought over and parts of the area change hands with relative frequency. Rebel Sunni groups with al-Qaeda sympathies have been attacking the town, where the population is predominantly Shia.

The military’s version of events is that the home-made rocket was fired at a military checkpoint situated at the entrance to the town. The immediate effects were to induce vomiting, fainting , suffocation and seizures among those in the immediate area.

A second source – a medic at the local civilian hospital – said that he personally witnessed Syrian army helping those wounded and dealing with fatalities at the scene. That Syrian soldiers were among the reported 26 deaths has not been disputed by either side.

The military source who spoke to Channel 4 News confirmed that artillery reports from the Syrian Army suggest a small rocket was fired from the vicinity of Al-Bab, a district close to Aleppo that is controlled by Jabhat al-Nusra – a jihadist group said to be linked with al-Qaeda and deemed a “terrorist organisation” by the US.

The American and independent weapons analysts do not believe that the regime or rebels used advanced chemical weapons last week, after studying initial intelligence reports and video coverage of survivors on state-run television.

However, they suspect that the victims were deliberately exposed to a “caustic” agent such as chlorine. This does not count as a chemical weapon, under terms laid down by international treaties, but as an improvised chemical device would represent a major escalation in the conflict.

Satellite intelligence analysed in Washington does not indicate a major missile launch at the time of the alleged attack, but officials said there could have been a “creative use” of a caustic agent.

CL17 is normal chlorine for swimming pools or industrial purposes. It is rated as Level 2 under the chemical weapons convention, which means it is dual purpose – it can be used as a weapon as well as for industrial or domestic purposes. Level 1 agents are chemicals whose sole use is as weapons, such as the nerve agents sarin or tabun.

There has been extensive experimentation by insurgents in Iraq in the use of chlorine, which is harmful when mixed with water to form hydrochloric acid. It vapourises quickly, meaning that in a big explosion it will evaporate; in a small blast – for instance, one delivered by a home-made rocket – it will turn into airborne droplets before dispersing quickly.

So it is likely only to produce limited casualties. In this case there were only 26 fatalities, far fewer than would be expected from a full chemical weapon attack. In short, it is easily improvised into a chemical device but not one that would be used by an army seeking mass-casualty effects.

Tellingly, just to the east of Aleppo, there is a rather nondescript factory whose purpose is to produce chlorine.

All claims by all sides in war need to be checked against available evidence. But what is clear in this case is that the Syrian claims do tally with some key agreed facts: the small number of casualties; proven availability of the chemical in the area; relatively low casualties; and a complaint taken seriously and acted upon by the UN with uncharacteristic speed.

Mr Ban said the UN would insist on “unfettered access” to the area under investigation. Allegations of chemical weapons usage are of course one of the most potent in the battle of claims and counter-claims in the conflict.

A government source confirmed that blood and soil samples had been collected and had been sent to the UN already. The UN has also been sent the phone numbers of the doctors involved.

Syria is believed to possess one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world, allegedly holding supplies of sarin, mustard and VX gases, all banned under international law. Damascus denies the claims.

There have been repeated reports that Syria was moving chemical weapons as it lost control of swaths of the country to the rebels. As the civil war rages, one of the West’s greatest fears is that these stockpiles could fall into the hands of Islamic extremists.

Alex Thomson is Chief Correspondent, Channel 4 News.

  1. Shona Duncan says:

    Syria is going to have presidential elections soon, it isn’t as if there isn’t a democracy. I don’t know what upset everything in Syria, the usual suspects I assume.

  2. Randy Crow says:

    Two links which follow refer to Mustard Gas and Depleted Uranium. In the first it is clear the victims of the gas attack are Syrian Nationals. This points the blame at CIA armed Sunni alQueda terrori$t$. Also interesting is this WMD attack coincides with Obama’s first visit to Israel as President. Is the Fa$ci$t Muslim Brotherhood hoping for an fellow brother Obama High Five for this attack? The article could easily be disinformation from start to finish. Israel is said to hoard the largest stash of Mustard Gas chemical weapons in the Mid East and this article distances Mustard Gas from the cause of the deaths. The fact this is Obama’s first trip to Israel as President and the fact this is a WMD attack leads me to believe this is a well planned professional op wrapped within a signature False Flag. The fact the calls for an investigation of this WMD attack has fallen on deaf ears and even coincides with the Cyprus theft indicates its professional and very high tech hidden behind amateurism and not even close to being a fly by night hit by a gang members. The second article on the long term US use of Depleted Uranium in Iraq lets me know the US has a clear propensity to use weapons to reduce population, a main NWO goal, and incredibly evil.

  3. Randy Crow says:

    A second point. The pic included with this article I assume is a pic of the gas used. Chlorine would be clear. This pic reminds me of the pics on the web of Mustard Gas made to look black. Might be a Black Power and Mustard Gas mix. Find out what country has Mustard Gas, we know Israel does, not sure if Syria does, find out where its stored, and one would be on the road to finding who dun it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s